<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eric peterson poll results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.instantcognition.com/web-analytics/bloggers/2007/02/17/eric-peterson-poll-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.instantcognition.com/web-analytics/bloggers/2007/02/17/eric-peterson-poll-results/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=eric-peterson-poll-results</link>
	<description>a discussion of visual report design &#038; web analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 07:27:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web Analytics Demystified &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Example uses of the visitor engagement metric</title>
		<link>http://blog.instantcognition.com/web-analytics/bloggers/2007/02/17/eric-peterson-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-16949</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Analytics Demystified &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Example uses of the visitor engagement metric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.instantcognition.com/web-analytics/bloggers/2007/02/17/eric-peterson-poll-results/#comment-16949</guid>
		<description>[...] exhibiting highly-engaged behavior on my site (see late August and early September.) Given that Clint proved that conversion is a poor measure of success when trying to evaluate traffic from other... I think visitor engagement is useful for examining the non-revenue value of referring sources [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exhibiting highly-engaged behavior on my site (see late August and early September.) Given that Clint proved that conversion is a poor measure of success when trying to evaluate traffic from other&#8230; I think visitor engagement is useful for examining the non-revenue value of referring sources [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://blog.instantcognition.com/web-analytics/bloggers/2007/02/17/eric-peterson-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-6695</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 20:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.instantcognition.com/web-analytics/bloggers/2007/02/17/eric-peterson-poll-results/#comment-6695</guid>
		<description>Sample size, depends on your point of view...Feedburner says I have 291 readers so the sample size there is just under 8%. However, if I look at visitors to the site, HBX says I have 140 weekly visitors so far so the sample rate is 16.4%. On a pure percentage basis, the sample size is probably ok, but since we both know the sample doesn&#039;t really have any statistical rigor (random sample, etc) take it for what it&#039;s worth.

I was feeling pretty lazy when I put up the poll so I didn&#039;t hack the MajikWidget code in order to segment around respondents vs. non respondents. Therefore, I can&#039;t prove the second part of my hypothesis, which, as we discussed, is whether or not the readers who were predisposed to &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; answer were those who find their way here through search engine referrals - just over half my visits this week came from search keyword referrals and a quick eyeball of what keywords were used tells me that the majority of my search traffic comes from excel and/or report design based questions and not web analytics questions.

I can tell that click-through from the feed to the site was relatively low for the poll (27 for the last 7 days) Does that agree with what you see in Workstation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sample size, depends on your point of view&#8230;Feedburner says I have 291 readers so the sample size there is just under 8%. However, if I look at visitors to the site, HBX says I have 140 weekly visitors so far so the sample rate is 16.4%. On a pure percentage basis, the sample size is probably ok, but since we both know the sample doesn&#8217;t really have any statistical rigor (random sample, etc) take it for what it&#8217;s worth.</p>
<p>I was feeling pretty lazy when I put up the poll so I didn&#8217;t hack the MajikWidget code in order to segment around respondents vs. non respondents. Therefore, I can&#8217;t prove the second part of my hypothesis, which, as we discussed, is whether or not the readers who were predisposed to <em>not</em> answer were those who find their way here through search engine referrals &#8211; just over half my visits this week came from search keyword referrals and a quick eyeball of what keywords were used tells me that the majority of my search traffic comes from excel and/or report design based questions and not web analytics questions.</p>
<p>I can tell that click-through from the feed to the site was relatively low for the poll (27 for the last 7 days) Does that agree with what you see in Workstation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric T. Peterson</title>
		<link>http://blog.instantcognition.com/web-analytics/bloggers/2007/02/17/eric-peterson-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-6694</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric T. Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.instantcognition.com/web-analytics/bloggers/2007/02/17/eric-peterson-poll-results/#comment-6694</guid>
		<description>Clint, excellent poll and as I suspected, your learned audience is already full of (hopefully satisfied) book owners.  The only question I would ask is how large of a sample did you get relative to your total readership?

I&#039;m not at my Workstation right now but I think you have more than 33 readers.  I guess I have to wonder if the non-responding readers were uninterested in the poll, didn&#039;t respond to the title of the post, or are just sick of reading about me in the blogosphere of late (I am a bit over-exposed due to the AMA event ...)

Anywhoway, have a nice long weekend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clint, excellent poll and as I suspected, your learned audience is already full of (hopefully satisfied) book owners.  The only question I would ask is how large of a sample did you get relative to your total readership?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not at my Workstation right now but I think you have more than 33 readers.  I guess I have to wonder if the non-responding readers were uninterested in the poll, didn&#8217;t respond to the title of the post, or are just sick of reading about me in the blogosphere of late (I am a bit over-exposed due to the AMA event &#8230;)</p>
<p>Anywhoway, have a nice long weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

